I was too busy to post this a few days ago, but it's an interesting article. It's about that study awhile back about a possible link between a vaccine and autism. 10 of the 13 researchers have published a retraction and recent information, if known back then, would have resulted in the study being discredited and never published, especially this bit:
"On Feb. 23, the journal's editors posted an online statement saying Wakefield was being paid by lawyers for parents who allege their children were harmed by the immunization."
He was one of the researchers, and yeah, a bit of a conflict of interest there.
"On Feb. 23, the journal's editors posted an online statement saying Wakefield was being paid by lawyers for parents who allege their children were harmed by the immunization."
He was one of the researchers, and yeah, a bit of a conflict of interest there.